AI Prompts for Claude for Code Review

20 of the best prompts for Claude for code review, step by step across 4 stages. Works with ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

AI Prompts for Claude for Code Review

20 of the best prompts for Claude for code review, step by step across 4 stages. Works with ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

Scroll to explore

Get thorough, senior-level code reviews that catch real issues, enforce standards, and improve code quality. This guide walks you through every stage of Claude for Code Review, from Correctness and Logic all the way through Maintainability and Standards, with a curated, copy-ready prompt at each step. Each stage targets a specific phase of the process so you always know exactly what to ask and what output to expect. Works with ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini and any other major AI tool.

Correctness and Logic

Claude checks code for bugs, logic errors, and incorrect behavior before it ships.

Review code

Review this code for correctness: [PASTE CODE]. Look for logic errors, off-by-one errors, incorrect assumptions, and cases where the code will not behave as the developer intends.

Correctness and Logic

Function claims

This function claims to do [DESCRIBED BEHAVIOR]. Does it actually do that? [PASTE CODE]. Walk through the logic with a few concrete inputs and show where it succeeds or fails.

Correctness and Logic

Find Find the bugs

Find the bugs in this code: [PASTE CODE]. Do not just list them, explain why each is a bug and what the correct behavior should be.

Correctness and Logic

Review code

Review this code for edge cases that are not handled: [PASTE CODE]. What inputs, states, or sequences will cause unexpected behavior? What should happen in each case?

Correctness and Logic

Wrote code

I wrote this code to solve [PROBLEM]: [PASTE CODE]. Is this the right solution? Are there cases where it will give wrong answers, infinite loops, or incorrect state?

Correctness and Logic

Security and Safety

Claude identifies security vulnerabilities and unsafe patterns that human reviewers often miss.

Review code

Review this code for security vulnerabilities: [PASTE CODE]. Check for: injection risks, improper input validation, authentication/authorization issues, data exposure, and insecure dependencies.

Security and Safety

Code handles user

This code handles user input: [PASTE CODE]. Is it sanitizing and validating correctly? What injection or manipulation attacks does it leave open?

Security and Safety

Review authentication / authorization

Review this authentication / authorization code: [PASTE CODE]. What security assumptions is it making? Where could it be bypassed or manipulated?

Security and Safety

Code handles sensitive

This code handles sensitive data (passwords, tokens, PII): [PASTE CODE]. Is it storing, transmitting, and handling it securely? What should be changed?

Security and Safety

Review API endpoint

Review this API endpoint for security issues: [PASTE CODE]. Check authentication, rate limiting, input validation, error message information leakage, and CORS configuration.

Security and Safety

Performance and Efficiency

Claude identifies performance bottlenecks and inefficiencies that compound at scale.

Review code

Review this code for performance issues: [PASTE CODE]. Identify O(n²) or worse algorithms, unnecessary database queries, blocking operations, and memory inefficiencies. Suggest concrete improvements.

Performance and Efficiency

Code makes database

This code makes database calls: [PASTE CODE]. Is it making N+1 queries? Are queries properly indexed? Is it fetching more data than needed? What are the performance risks at scale?

Performance and Efficiency

Review code

Review this code for memory usage issues: [PASTE CODE]. Are there memory leaks, large objects kept in memory unnecessarily, or patterns that will not scale?

Performance and Efficiency

Is hot path

This is a hot path that runs [FREQUENCY]: [PASTE CODE]. What would you optimize first? What is the likely bottleneck at [EXPECTED LOAD]?

Performance and Efficiency

Compare Compare these two

Compare these two implementations and explain which performs better and why: [PASTE IMPLEMENTATION A] vs [PASTE IMPLEMENTATION B].

Performance and Efficiency

Maintainability and Standards

Claude reviews code for long-term maintainability, readability, and team standards.

Review code

Review this code for maintainability: [PASTE CODE]. Is it easy to understand, modify, and extend? What would make it harder to maintain six months from now?

Maintainability and Standards

Review PR diff

Review this PR diff for adherence to these standards: [PASTE STANDARDS OR DESCRIBE THEM]. Flag every violation with the specific line and the applicable rule.

Maintainability and Standards

Code will be

This code will be maintained by a team. Review it for: naming clarity, appropriate abstraction level, documentation of non-obvious logic, and consistency with common patterns.

Maintainability and Standards

Code has too

This code has too much complexity. Suggest how to simplify it without losing functionality: [PASTE CODE]. Break it down into the specific changes that would have the most impact on readability.

Maintainability and Standards

Write code review comment

Write a code review comment for this code as if you were a senior engineer giving feedback to a junior. Be specific, educational, and constructive: [PASTE CODE].

Maintainability and Standards

Frequently asked questions

Can Claude review code in any language?+

Claude reviews code across all major languages: Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Go, Rust, Java, C#, SQL, and more. Tell it the language and any framework-specific conventions to apply.

How do I get the most out of a Claude code review?+

Give context: what the code is supposed to do, what you are most worried about, and any constraints (performance requirements, security context, team standards). The more context, the more targeted the review.

Can Claude review an entire pull request?+

Yes. Paste the diff or the changed files with context about the PR goal. For very large PRs, focus Claude on the highest-risk areas first: security-sensitive code, core business logic, and new APIs.

Does Claude catch security vulnerabilities reliably?+

Claude is good at common vulnerability classes, SQL injection, XSS, authentication issues, insecure direct object references. It is not a replacement for dedicated SAST tools but adds useful reasoning about security that automated tools miss.

Can Claude help me respond to review comments I received?+

Yes. Paste the review comment and the relevant code and Claude helps you understand the feedback, decide whether it is valid, and write the fix.