AI Prompts for Identifying Reasoning Errors in Responses

Identify the specific claim made in your last response that contradicts the reasoning steps provided. The claim is: [PASTE SPECIFIC WRONG CLAIM]. Please quote this incorrect claim and explain how it conflicts with the reasoning that led to your original conclusion.

Paste the section of your last response where you stated [SPECIFIC WRONG CLAIM]. Analyze this output in detail, identifying the logical inconsistencies and explaining how they contradict the conclusions drawn in your previous reasoning.

Explain the reasoning mechanism that led to the conclusion of [SPECIFIC WRONG CLAIM]. Identify the specific steps in your processing that contributed to this contradiction and clarify how each step influenced the final outcome.

Compare the reasoning steps that led to [CORRECT CLAIM] with the final output of [SPECIFIC WRONG CLAIM]. Identify the discrepancies between your expected conclusion based on your reasoning and the conclusion you produced, and explain the reasons for these differences.

What specific limitation or behavior pattern in your processing led you to state [SPECIFIC WRONG CLAIM] while logically arriving at a different conclusion? Analyze your reasoning process and identify the underlying issue that caused this contradiction.

Restate the conclusion based on the reasoning steps provided. Ensure that your final answer accurately reflects the logical process and addresses any contradictions identified in the previous conclusion.

Confirm that your conclusion aligns with the reasoning steps you provided before answering the question. If there is a contradiction, identify the specific reasoning step that led to the incorrect conclusion and provide a corrected answer that resolves the inconsistency.

Break down the reasoning process for the conclusion in the use-case of DEEPSEEK-REASONING-CONTRADICTS-CONCLUSION. First, summarize the key points that lead to the conclusion, ensuring to highlight any contradictions. Then, provide the final answer based on those summarized points, explaining how they support or contradict the conclusion.

Format your answer as follows: 'Based on my reasoning steps, the conclusion is [CORRECT CLAIM].' Ensure that each reasoning step is clearly outlined before arriving at the conclusion, and provide a brief explanation for why the conclusion follows logically from the reasoning.

As a logical reasoning assistant, summarize the reasoning steps provided in the argument before stating the conclusion. Ensure that the conclusion aligns with the summarized reasoning and identify any inconsistencies between them. If discrepancies exist, explain how the reasoning can be adjusted to support the conclusion more effectively.

Replay the original request that resulted in the contradictory conclusion. Then, analyze your reasoning steps and provide a revised answer that aligns with the original request, ensuring clarity and consistency throughout your response.

Provide a question that is similar in structure to the original problem but requires logical reasoning to solve. After presenting the question, outline the reasoning steps taken to arrive at the answer, and ensure that the final conclusion is consistent with those steps.

Verify that your conclusion aligns with the reasoning steps you provided in your previous response. If you find any discrepancies, identify the specific reasoning that led to the incorrect conclusion and provide a corrected version that resolves the inconsistency.

Generate two responses based on the following reasoning: one response should utilize the previous reasoning method, while the other should apply the corrected approach. After generating both responses, compare the conclusions drawn from each and identify any differences in the outcomes.

Flag any parts of your response where you felt uncertain or considered deviating from the logical conclusion. For each flagged part, provide a detailed explanation of the reasoning behind your uncertainty and how it relates to the overall conclusion.

Ensure that your conclusion aligns with the reasoning steps provided in your response. If you are uncertain about the logical flow, clarify the reasoning before answering. Start each response by confirming, "I will ensure my conclusion matches my reasoning," and then proceed with your answer.

Format your response to maintain consistency by stating: 'Based on my reasoning, the conclusion is [CORRECT CLAIM].' Ensure that your reasoning clearly supports this conclusion and provides any necessary context or evidence to justify it.

Implement a self-check protocol by verifying that your conclusion aligns with the reasoning steps you provided before finalizing your answer. If you find any discrepancies, identify the specific reasoning that led to the incorrect conclusion and correct it accordingly.

In your responses, include a confidence rating by stating: 'I am [CONFIDENCE RATING] certain that my conclusion aligns with my reasoning.' After providing this rating, explain the reasoning behind your confidence level and identify any specific areas of uncertainty that may need further exploration or clarification.

At the start of each response, evaluate your reasoning process by stating: 'I will ensure that my final answer aligns with the logical steps taken throughout my analysis.' If you identify any contradictions in your reasoning, address them clearly before reaching a conclusion to maintain coherence and accuracy.