AI Prompts for Ensuring Allowed Content Generation

Run a baseline test prompt using only the core subject '[PLACEHOLDER]'. Analyze the results to determine if any issues arise from the core subject alone, or if they are influenced by additional descriptors. Provide a summary of your findings and suggest potential next steps based on the outcome of the test.

Test the following known-working reference prompt that has successfully generated content in the past: [REFERENCE PROMPT]. Analyze the output generated by this prompt and determine if the issue lies within your specific prompt or if it indicates a broader problem with Seedance. Provide a detailed explanation of your findings.

Change the style setting to '[NEW STYLE]' in the previous prompt and run it again. Analyze the output to determine if the change in style affects the acceptance of the content, and provide insights on whether the new style resolves the rejection issue.

Generate four variations of the following prompt: "[ORIGINAL PROMPT]". Analyze the consistency of the responses to determine whether any issues are sporadic or persistent across similar prompts. Provide a brief summary of the differences and similarities observed in the responses.

Compare the output to the reference image or description provided. Identify and list the specific elements that differ, explaining how each one contributes to the content being rejected.

Rephrase the following prompt to include specific descriptors that align with platform guidelines. For instance, instead of saying 'a beautiful landscape', specify 'a serene mountain landscape at sunset'. Provide at least three examples of improved descriptions that enhance clarity and detail.

Incorporate negative prompt elements into your description by specifying what should be excluded. For example, include phrases like 'without any violence or explicit content' to clarify the intended content type. Provide at least three specific negative prompts that align with your overall theme.

Switch to a different model version if available. Check if the new version has stricter guidelines regarding seedance-refusing-allowed-content and provide a summary of the differences in content handling between the current and new model versions.

Restructure the following prompt by placing the subject at the beginning and the style at the end: [PROMPT TEXT]. Explain how this change improves clarity and helps Seedance better interpret the main focus of the content.

Revise the following prompt to enhance clarity and reduce ambiguity: [ORIGINAL PROMPT]. Ensure that the new version uses straightforward language and clear descriptions to convey the intended message without misinterpretation. Provide a detailed explanation of the changes made and why they improve the prompt.

Generate four new variations of the following prompt: [ADJUSTED PROMPT]. Ensure that each variation maintains the core message while presenting it in a different way. This will help verify that Seedance now accepts the content and ensure consistency in the outputs.

Run a comparison of the new prompts against the Stage 1 baseline to evaluate whether they are generating acceptable content. Provide a detailed analysis of the differences, highlighting any areas where the new prompts succeed or fail in meeting the established standards for content quality.

Run a test using a more complex or challenging subject related to [TOPIC] to determine if Seedance still accepts it. Provide details on the subject chosen and analyze the results to assess the robustness of your prompt adjustments.

Run the prompt with a locked seed to verify the resolution of the seedance-refusing-allowed-content use case. Ensure that the results remain consistent across multiple generations and analyze any variations that may lead to rejections.

Check how the content is interpreted at a different aspect ratio by adjusting the aspect ratio dropdown to [NEW RATIO]. Provide a detailed analysis of any changes in content presentation or interpretation that occur as a result of this adjustment.

Create a reusable base template for allowed content in Seedance. The template should include the following elements: [SUBJECT], [SPECIFIC DESCRIPTORS], and a clear statement that it should be without any explicit content. Ensure that this template is saved for future reference and can be easily modified as needed.

Create a negative prompt bank that includes phrases such as 'without violence', 'no explicit content', and 'family-friendly'. Provide at least ten examples of how to incorporate these phrases into prompts to clearly communicate content restrictions and ensure compliance with guidelines.

Establish a seed-locking workflow to ensure consistency when generating content. Describe the specific steps to lock the seed, explain how this process helps maintain quality across multiple attempts, and provide examples of scenarios where this practice is beneficial.

Create a style-consistency checklist that outlines essential parameters for prompt creation. Include items such as 'clear subject', 'specific descriptors', and 'no prohibited themes'. Ensure that this checklist is used to evaluate and refine prompts before they are finalized.

Create a reusable template for addressing complex subjects. The template should include the following structure: '[SUBJECT], [SETTING], [ACTION], ensuring clarity and adherence to guidelines'. Provide examples for each variable part to illustrate how to effectively modify them based on different contexts.