20 of the best prompts for decision making, step by step across 4 stages. Works with ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.
20 of the best prompts for decision making, step by step across 4 stages. Works with ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.
Published June 27, 2026
Getting Decision Making right takes more than a single prompt. This 4-stage guide covers Frame the Decision Correctly, Generate and Evaluate Options, Analyze Tradeoffs and Risks, and more, breaking the whole process into focused steps where each prompt builds on the last. Better decisions come from clearer thinking, not more information. AI is most useful here not as an oracle that gives you the answer, but as a thinking partner that helps you structure the problem, expose hidden assumptions, stress-test options, and communicate your reasoning. These prompts cover the full decision-making process: framing decisions clearly, generating and evaluating options, analyzing tradeoffs, and committing with confidence. Every prompt is optimized and runs in ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.
Most bad decisions are badly framed decisions. These prompts help you define what you are actually deciding before you start evaluating options.
Define the real decision
I am trying to decide: [DESCRIBE WHAT YOU THINK THE DECISION IS]. Help me check whether I am framing this correctly. Is this actually the decision I need to make, or is there a more fundamental decision upstream? Am I solving the right problem? What would I need to decide first before this decision even becomes relevant? Help me frame this clearly before I generate options.
Identify decision criteria
I need to make this decision: [DESCRIBE DECISION]. Help me identify the criteria I should use to evaluate my options. What factors actually matter for this decision? What would a good outcome look like? What constraints must any option satisfy? What am I willing to trade off and what is non-negotiable? Organize the criteria by importance.
Separate reversible from irreversible decisions
I am facing this decision: [DESCRIBE]. Help me think about reversibility. Is this a one-way door or a two-way door? If I make this choice and it turns out to be wrong, how hard is it to undo? What are the costs of reversing course later? How much time and evidence should I gather before deciding, given how reversible or irreversible this is?
Identify who should make this decision
A decision needs to be made about [DESCRIBE DECISION]. The people involved are: [DESCRIBE STAKEHOLDERS AND THEIR ROLES]. Who should actually make this decision? Who should be consulted but not decide? Who needs to be informed but not involved? Helping me clarify the decision-making authority will prevent the most common cause of slow or bad decisions in teams.
Expose hidden assumptions
I am leaning toward [DESCRIBE OPTION YOU FAVOR] for this reason: [DESCRIBE YOUR REASONING]. What assumptions am I making that must be true for this reasoning to hold? List every assumption, especially the ones I am probably not questioning. For each one, tell me how likely it is to be true and what I should do if it turns out to be wrong.
Most people evaluate too few options. These prompts expand your option set before you narrow down.
Generate options I have not considered
I am deciding between: [LIST THE OPTIONS YOU ARE CURRENTLY CONSIDERING]. What options am I probably not considering? Think outside the obvious choices. Include: hybrid approaches, completely different framings of the problem, options that involve doing nothing or delaying, and options that would only make sense if my assumptions are wrong.
Evaluate options against criteria
I need to choose between these options: [LIST OPTIONS]. My decision criteria are: [LIST CRITERIA FROM MOST TO LEAST IMPORTANT]. For each option, score it against each criterion (1 to 5) and give a one-sentence explanation. Then give me a weighted summary and tell me which option scores best overall and whether the scoring matches my gut.
Apply a decision framework
Help me apply [CHOOSE A FRAMEWORK: THE 10/10/10 RULE, THE REGRET MINIMIZATION FRAMEWORK, FIRST PRINCIPLES THINKING, COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS, EXPECTED VALUE] to this decision: [DESCRIBE DECISION AND OPTIONS]. Walk me through the framework step by step and tell me what conclusion it leads to.
Find the option with the best downside protection
I am choosing between these options: [LIST OPTIONS]. I am more worried about a bad outcome than excited about the best-case scenario. Which option gives me the best protection if things go wrong? For each option, describe: the worst realistic outcome, how likely it is, and what I would do if it happened. Recommend the option with the most acceptable downside.
Think through second-order consequences
I am considering this decision: [DESCRIBE OPTION YOU ARE LEANING TOWARD]. What are the second and third-order consequences? What does this decision make more likely to happen in 6 months? In 2 years? What does it make harder to do later? What precedent does it set? I want to think beyond the immediate outcome.
Every decision involves tradeoffs. These prompts make the tradeoffs explicit so you can choose knowingly rather than ignore them.
Map the tradeoffs between options
I am deciding between: [LIST OPTIONS]. For each option, state explicitly: what I gain, what I give up, and what I am betting on being true. Present the tradeoffs as a clear comparison rather than a list of pros and cons. Then tell me: which tradeoff is most uncomfortable and whether that discomfort is pointing to something important.
Run a pre-mortem on a decision
I am about to make this decision: [DESCRIBE]. Imagine it is 18 months from now and the outcome was a failure. What went wrong? List the five most likely causes of failure, ranked by probability. Then for each one, tell me what I could do now to reduce that risk. A pre-mortem makes decisions better, not more fearful.
Identify what information would change my decision
I am leaning toward [DESCRIBE OPTION]. What information, if I had it, would change my decision? What would I need to learn to switch to a different option? This tells me which uncertainties actually matter and which I should try to resolve before deciding. If most of the answer is "nothing would change my mind," that is also useful to know.
Assess the cost of delay
I am delaying a decision about [DESCRIBE]. What is the cost of waiting? What opportunities am I missing while I gather more information? What is the risk of making the decision with less information now versus more information later? Help me think about whether more time will actually change my decision or whether I am just delaying the discomfort.
Challenge my current reasoning
I have decided to [DESCRIBE YOUR DECISION]. I think this is right because: [DESCRIBE YOUR REASONING]. Play devil's advocate. What is the strongest case against this decision? What would someone who disagrees with me say? What would I need to believe for the opposite choice to make more sense? I want my reasoning stress-tested, not validated.
A decision only has value if it is followed through. These prompts help you communicate clearly, build alignment, and put the decision into action.
Write a decision memo
I have decided to [DESCRIBE DECISION]. Write a decision memo for [DESCRIBE AUDIENCE: MY TEAM, MY MANAGER, THE BOARD] that explains: what was decided, the options that were considered, the reasoning behind the choice, the key risks and how we plan to manage them, and the next steps. Keep it to one page. Be direct and confident.
Communicate a difficult decision to stakeholders
I need to communicate this decision to [DESCRIBE AUDIENCE] and it will not be well received because: [DESCRIBE WHY IT IS DIFFICULT]. Write a communication that: states the decision clearly upfront, explains the reasoning honestly, acknowledges the impact on the people affected, and gives a clear path forward. Do not bury the decision or over-apologize for it.
Create an implementation plan for a decision
I have made this decision: [DESCRIBE]. Now I need to implement it. Break the implementation into specific steps, assign rough timelines, identify the first three actions I should take in the next 48 hours, and flag the biggest risk in the implementation phase. The decision is made. Now help me execute.
Set success criteria for a decision
I have made this decision: [DESCRIBE]. How will I know if it was the right call? Define: what success looks like at 30, 90, and 180 days, the specific metrics or signals I should track, when I should evaluate whether to change course, and the difference between a decision that was wrong and a decision that just had a bad outcome due to circumstances outside my control.
Document the decision for future reference
Document this decision for our team's records: [DESCRIBE DECISION]. Include: the date, the decision made, who made it, the options that were considered, the criteria used to evaluate them, the reasoning for the final choice, the expected outcome, and a planned review date. Good decision documentation helps teams learn from both successes and mistakes.
AI helps most with the thinking structure around a decision: framing it correctly, generating options you may not have considered, identifying hidden assumptions, and stress-testing your reasoning. It does not make the decision for you, and it does not know your specific context the way you do. Use it to think more rigorously, not to outsource judgment.
The regret minimization framework (what will I regret most at age 80?) works well because it forces a long time horizon. The pre-mortem (assume failure and work backward) is reliable for exposing risks. First principles thinking works well for complex strategic decisions. Ask AI to apply any framework explicitly and walk you through it step by step.
Use AI to compress the information-gathering and option-generation phases. Instead of spending days mapping all options, ask AI to generate them in five minutes, then evaluate them yourself. Use the criteria-scoring prompt to turn a complex multi-factor decision into a structured comparison rather than holding everything in your head.
Yes, by separating the rational analysis from the emotional response. Use AI to structure the logic and map the tradeoffs, then notice where your gut strongly disagrees with the rational output. That gap is often where the most important information is. AI can also help you name what you are afraid of, which is often the real driver of a difficult decision.
Asking AI to make the decision rather than improve the thinking. If you ask "should I take this job offer," you get a generic response. If you say "here are my criteria, here are the tradeoffs, challenge my reasoning," you get something genuinely useful. AI is a thinking partner, not a decision oracle.
AI Prompts for Resolving Conflicting API Routes
Lovable may generate API endpoints or page routes that conflict with existing ones, causing unexpected behavior in your application.
See promptsAI Prompts for Eliminating Unnecessary Abstraction Layers
Lovable creates wrapper functions or utility layers for logic used only once, causing unnecessary complexity.
See promptsAI Prompts for Managing Context Window Limits
Bolt runs out of context mid-task, causing it to lose progress on large codebases.
See prompts